Conversation
|
On it! We are reviewing the PR and will provide feedback shortly. |
PR DescriptionThis pull request introduces a new function, Click to see moreKey Technical ChangesA new function Architecture DecisionsNo explicit architectural decisions are apparent. However, the placement of the Dependencies and InteractionsThis change doesn't introduce any new dependencies. It interacts with the existing Risk ConsiderationsThe primary risk is that the function's name is misleading, as it doesn't return zero. The lack of a docstring makes it harder to understand the function's purpose. The placement outside the class might be unintentional and could lead to confusion. The mathematical expression could be simplified for better readability and performance. There is also a risk that the function is not properly tested. Notable Implementation DetailsThe function's implementation |
| def zero(x, y): | ||
| return 0 + x + y - x + 2 * x + 3 * y |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This function has an indentation issue. Based on the class structure, this should be a method of the Calculator class and needs proper indentation to align with other methods. Also, it's missing the self parameter that's required for instance methods.
| def zero(x, y): | |
| return 0 + x + y - x + 2 * x + 3 * y | |
| def zero(self, x, y): | |
| return 0 + x + y - x + 2 * x + 3 * y |
Did we get this right? 👍 / 👎 to inform future reviews.
No description provided.