Skip to content

Update calculator.py#12

Open
rohitvinnakota-codecov wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
rohitvinnakota-codecov-patch-10
Open

Update calculator.py#12
rohitvinnakota-codecov wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
rohitvinnakota-codecov-patch-10

Conversation

@rohitvinnakota-codecov
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

@rohitvinnakota-codecov
Copy link
Owner Author

On it! We are reviewing the PR and will provide feedback shortly.

@rohitvinnakota-codecov
Copy link
Owner Author

PR Description

This pull request introduces a new function, zero, to the calculator.py module. The intended purpose is to add a new mathematical operation to the calculator's capabilities.

Click to see more

Key Technical Changes

A new function zero(x, y) is added. This function calculates 0 + x + y - x + 2 * x + 3 * y, which simplifies to 2x + 4y. The function currently resides outside the Calculator class, which is a potential issue. The function also lacks a docstring and could benefit from a more descriptive name.

Architecture Decisions

No explicit architectural decisions are apparent. However, the placement of the zero function outside the Calculator class deviates from the existing structure and might indicate a need to re-evaluate the module's organization. The absence of a self parameter suggests it's intended as a standalone function, which is inconsistent with the other methods.

Dependencies and Interactions

This change doesn't introduce any new dependencies. It interacts with the existing calculator.py module by adding a new function. It doesn't directly interact with other parts of the system, but any module using the Calculator class could potentially call this new function if it were a method of the class.

Risk Considerations

The primary risk is that the function's name is misleading, as it doesn't return zero. The lack of a docstring makes it harder to understand the function's purpose. The placement outside the class might be unintentional and could lead to confusion. The mathematical expression could be simplified for better readability and performance. There is also a risk that the function is not properly tested.

Notable Implementation Details

The function's implementation 0 + x + y - x + 2 * x + 3 * y can be simplified to 2 * x + 4 * y. The function lacks a docstring. The function is defined outside the Calculator class, which is inconsistent with other functions in the file. The function does not include a self parameter.

Comment on lines +18 to +19
def zero(x, y):
return 0 + x + y - x + 2 * x + 3 * y
Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This function has an indentation issue. Based on the class structure, this should be a method of the Calculator class and needs proper indentation to align with other methods. Also, it's missing the self parameter that's required for instance methods.

Suggested change
def zero(x, y):
return 0 + x + y - x + 2 * x + 3 * y
def zero(self, x, y):
return 0 + x + y - x + 2 * x + 3 * y

Did we get this right? 👍 / 👎 to inform future reviews.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant